Creating valuable customer experience is kind of brave. Coming up with ideas that serve the brand must be done without fear. Being responsible for the results takes courage.
Daring To Be Different.
8 min. reading
The marketing funnel model of the early 20th century no longer works. And it's no wonder - the whole of society and the economy on which it is built have changed. For brands, this means the inevitable necessity of changing their values and the way they present themselves. You can turn a blind eye to the first fact and drift for a little longer in the winds of change. But if you hide your head in the sand, it could easily lead your brand to oblivion.
If marketing has a goal, it is to reach us, the consumer, at moments that have the greatest impact on our decision-making process. These are so-called touchpoints, moments, or places where we can perceive the brand and which may lead to a decision to buy its product. For years, touchpoints have been understood in association with the purchase funnel, which describes the customer's path in his decision-making process, from brand awareness, through the creation of opinion and consideration, to the moment of purchasing the product. In 1898 Elmo Lewis described it as a theoretical model, and in the middle of the last century, it was elaborated with new levels.
According to this traditional way of thinking, we, the consumers, start with a number of potential brands in mind, so we should know as much as possible about the brand at the beginning. We then gradually move through the funnel and, as we get acquainted with the content, we filter and reduce the number of brands that we focus our attention on, until we finally fall out of the funnel with only one brand, which we choose to buy. And in an ideal world, we remain loyal to it. Since its propagation, this model has been embraced as marketing’s central metaphor with only minimal modifications.
Thanks to this simplification, the so-called marketing funnel has become one of the pillars of the decision-making process used by brands. The model is used by agencies to plan the distribution of activities, the means of communication, and in particular, the associated distribution of the marketing budget. The lion’s share of energy and finance is therefore invested in raising awareness, hoping that at the end of the journey we consumers will choose the brand. But the biggest weakness lies in this metaphor.
/ The traditional Purchase Funnel, which marketing has adopted as a metaphor for its activities.
At the start of the 21st century, the first evidence began to appear that the process needed to be fundamentally reworked from a marketing perspective (2009, McKinsey & Company). Several years later, Mark Bronchek and Cara France published the results of a survey of marketing leaders such as Sephora, Google, Intuit, SAP, and others. These results showed that the marketing funnel could no longer be relied upon (2014, Harvard Business Review).
According to today's marketers, the primary problem is that the above model conceives of the path as a linear one. In the meantime, the purchase process has changed fundamentally, and with it the distribution and importance of individual touchpoints. As consumers, we are much more informed and connected. Within ourselves, we certainly go through a process of getting to know the brand, evaluating it, deciding to purchase and be loyal to it - sometimes in a matter of seconds. From the point of view of marketing, however, we freely enter the process of brand presentation at any stage of its communication. In contrast to the original idea, we pass through the whole funnel from below.
Let's say we want to buy a sports shirt. We have two or three brands on our minds which have aroused in us the desire to change our wardrobe. When we start looking for them on the Internet, we find about twenty other options. Logically, our attention then moves to the new variants. We find that we may want a different material, different functionality, different colors, or a different cut. We look at them, and the more attractive the goods offered, the more time we spend. To help us make a good decision, we look at some reviews. These usually point to other, previously hidden sources of amazing shirts. Under the weight of necessity, we are very likely to share this experience with friends at the earliest possible opportunity. Our friends will then, on the basis of their practical experience, add other key decisions to the story.
Is it any wonder that, at the moment of purchase, 70% of consumers still hesitate over which brand to choose? It is almost certain that at the end of the process, we will choose from a significantly larger number of brand names than we started with. It's tough for the brand that initially pumped its finances into giving us the idea of having a new t-shirt.
/ In 2009, McKinsey & Company outlined how the actual decision-making process - the Customer Decision Journey - worked. This is a circular path with four touchpoints representing a potential battleground:
In 2014, the Prague branch of the Grévin Museum, in cooperation with an advertising agency, launched a campaign to attract customers. According to its creators, it achieved a „significant increase in brand awareness“ (2018, Marketing&Media). In 2018 the Grévin management announced the end of its activities, as it had not been able to get this amazing project into the black, even after four years. Instead of finding their own uniqueness and an awareness of who they could truly be in a city as small as Prague, they believed that the problem was building awareness. They spent their finances "on others" to present an attractive package to "all." At the end of their story, only the media and the agencies into which they put their finances can be satisfied. Albeit with great results about brand knowledge.
Brands must open their eyes to the fact that key touchpoints lie in places other than those where traditional marketing looked for them. It is obvious that one's own recommendations have significantly greater weight.
Decisions about what to buy increasingly come from those who have had the opportunity to "experience" the brand - irrespective of whether they own it or not. They share their experience and knowledge with us and we simply believe them. This is why inbound marketing, which builds a world for a brand in which we want to live, is growing in importance. A place where they gain most of our attention. A place that inspires and engages us.
Experience and experiences are, more than ever before, of great importance in a brand's after-sales process from the point of view of loyalty. In McKinsey, they have defined two kinds of loyalty. The first is active loyalty: the consumer actively shares and recommends an experience with a brand and, in the age of social networks and communities, influences thousands of others. The second is passive loyalty: consumers who stay with a brand out of laziness or confusion over other choices prefer to stick with a brand without committing themselves. However, they remain open to news from competitors that give them a reason to change. For this reason, in particular, brands should actively and purposefully build a base of both existing customers and fans.
Luxury sports car vendor Advantage Cars organizes annual treasure hunt rides that have become synonymous with cars and driving experiences. Originally aimed at regular customers, after the first few years, the event attracted the attention of friends and acquaintances who owned cars from other vendors, thanks to sharing and word-of-mouth. And, even though the car industry has one of the highest degrees of brand loyalty, they either changed their car dealer or paid a much higher participation fee, just so they could share the experience and feel part of something bigger than an occasional e-mail or subsidiary service.
Nowadays, the delivery of intangible services as the highest value is automatically expected by customers. This is the second fundamental change that marketing needs to respond to. While brands can still ignore the malfunctioning of the traditional model and try to overwhelm it with media manipulation, hiding from changes in the company's economic cycle could cause serious complications.
Economists Pine and Gilmore published a study on the change in economics as early as 1998. By example, they show how its natural evolution occurs. In agrarian economics, a birthday cake was made entirely from the commodities that you grow or acquire on a farm. Flour, butter, eggs, sugar, which would, in practical terms, cost only a few crowns. As product-oriented industrial economics evolved, the approach changed, and you were able to buy some pre-prepared ingredients of the cake for tens of crowns. Later, when factory production was replaced by a service economy, product-related services became the highest value. Then you could buy the finished product - the cake - for hundreds of crowns. The services associated with its delivery have become a convenient and obvious component. Now, beginning in the 21st century, value is shifting to the knowledge gained through experience and experiences. Instead of visiting a shop, you can participate in an event for which you pay thousands of crowns, and you get a cake for free. From the extraction of commodities to the production of goods and the provision of services and support, we have achieved the preparation of brand experiences.
Have you built a showroom for your brand, a new service centre, better service facilities or a new helpline? And, despite pumping millions of crowns into it and advertising it on every corner, do customers still take it as a matter of course?
The differences are fundamental. Users and clients become guests. Nowadays, those who were served want to be involved. Before customers were interested in functions, then benefits, and now they want feelings and experiences. Business processes from production through delivery are becoming stages for experiences. Customization changes into personification.
An emphasis on brand awareness must be replaced by brand experience.
We are in the transition from selling services to selling experiences. This has a major impact on the perception of differences between brands. You must realize that the opportunity to differentiate yourself from the competition lies in creating values that bring strong experiences - ones that are educative and memorable. The rest is already automatically expected.
Changing the perception of how a brand can succeed in today’s world means abandoning traditional outbound marketing methods and the associated budgets for "external" companies. Open your eyes and find the courage to devote strength and energy to create your own world. Internal marketing before external communication. Create experiences. The beauty of the whole thing is that it can be good for consumers, employees, and the brands themselves.
Log in to a world cases that work, live campaign showrooms and up-to-date projects revised every week.
Are you a marketer? Claim your free trial for a complete guide to fresh marketing in the up-and-coming Experience Economy Era.
Includes campaign tips straight to your inbox to stay on track.
Enter your Email.
To get inspired and learn how brand leaders do it, visit the Banana Papers. The best live marketing archive helping brand managers succeed in the current Age of Experience.
Norsko: Až to přijde, sušenky mlékem milované přežijí.
Ocean: Taste the feeling ... of drowning.
Brazílie: Ze zbytků, po přidání tatarky, véča jako z Michelinky.
USA: Díky Art Institute of Chicago a Airbnb ucítíte, jaké to je žít v obraze.
UK: Některé nápady přichází přímo od zákazníků.
Dánsko: Spies travel agency připravila ochutnávku počasí doma.
USA: YSL Beauty postavil na ikonické Route 111 v kalifornské poušti pop-up obchod a make-up oázu v jednom.
Holandsko: Rijksmuseum odměnilo 10,000,000. návštěvníka unikátním zážitkem.
Skotsko: Model nového autobusu v měřítku 1:1.
USA: M&M's využilo k propagaci nové příchutě celé Time Square.
Rusko: Budweiser propojil drony, párty a fotbal do největší experience vůbec.
USA: Jamaica v New Yorku, New York na Jamaicu.
of making this new website stunning